[lkml]   [2000]   [Feb]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: elevator-starvation-4 (2.2.14 && 2.3.42)
Well, yes and no. I guess my fundamental claim is that if
userland is able to generate requests faster than the driver can
fulfill them for an extended period of time then we've got a larger
problem than worrying about a particular request taking a long time
to satisfy. Indeed, I claim that as long as the driver cannot keep up
there will always be a pathological case where a particular request
is unreasonably delayed.

I'm not saying I have any idea what the correct solution is, but
I feel that tackling the request scheduling problem is less
meaningful if we haven't at least taken a whack at solving the
request overrun problem.


At 00:59 -0500 02/11/2000, Jeff Garzik wrote:

>Surely you realize that the case where userland is generates requests
>faster than the driver can fulfill is a common case...
> Jeff
Bruce Thompson | "Pinky! Are you pondering what I'm
Palm Computing, Inc. | pondering?"
| "Uh, I think so Brain, but where will
| we find a duck and a hose at this | hour?"
My opinions are strictly my own.

PGP Fingerprint: 8F48 7FEF EE22 14FB 1F2E 3BF2 0D40 9628 53E8 72EB

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [W:0.124 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site