Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 11 Feb 2000 11:11:01 +0000 (GMT) | From | Matthew Kirkwood <> | Subject | Re: Capabilities |
| |
On Fri, 11 Feb 2000, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> [0] My thinking is somewhat slow today, but as I recall the > fs caps implementation wants to include all three sets, > yes? > > In the later POSIX drafts, I believe the fs capability sets have been > dropped down to two, "allowed" and "forced".
That makes a lot of sense from a comprehensibility standpoint :-)
If process has CAP_FOO-p, will it get EPERM (EACCESS?) if it tries to exec() a binary with that capability "forced"?
Matthew.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |