Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 10 Feb 2000 20:24:16 +0100 (CET) | From | Andrea Arcangeli <> | Subject | Re: lowlatency-2.2.14-B1 + 2.2.14aa7 fixes crash, but... |
| |
On Fri, 11 Feb 2000, William Montgomery wrote:
>(mark_buffer_clean and mark_buffer_dirty) are modified in the lowlatency >patch to be followed by a conditional_schedule. Why would this function
BUG -> mark_buffer_clean is never been supposed to be blocking! Remove the conditional_schedule from there.
>not also need it? I only ask because the latency has increased from
You'd better not conditional schedule there since it's called with a spinlock held ;).
>0.6ms to 1.4ms and I thought this might be the cause.
Yes I got your point but it sure isn't the problem.
Andrea
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |