lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Feb]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: lowlatency-2.2.14-B1 + 2.2.14aa7 fixes crash, but...
On Fri, 11 Feb 2000, William Montgomery wrote:

>(mark_buffer_clean and mark_buffer_dirty) are modified in the lowlatency
>patch to be followed by a conditional_schedule. Why would this function

BUG -> mark_buffer_clean is never been supposed to be blocking! Remove the
conditional_schedule from there.

>not also need it? I only ask because the latency has increased from

You'd better not conditional schedule there since it's called with a
spinlock held ;).

>0.6ms to 1.4ms and I thought this might be the cause.

Yes I got your point but it sure isn't the problem.

Andrea


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [W:0.089 / U:0.104 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site