This message generated a parse failure. Raw output follows here. Please use 'back' to navigate. From devnull@lkml.org Thu Apr 25 02:22:00 2024 Received: from lml.valinux.com (postfix@lml.valinux.com [198.186.203.19]) by herbie.ucs.indiana.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA21855 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2000 13:12:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from vger.rutgers.edu (vger.rutgers.edu [128.6.190.2]) by lml.valinux.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D968960C89; Tue, 1 Feb 2000 06:22:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by vger.rutgers.edu via listexpand id ; Tue, 1 Feb 2000 05:01:30 -0500 Received: by vger.rutgers.edu id ; Tue, 1 Feb 2000 05:01:21 -0500 Received: from smtp.fr.uu.net ([194.98.0.5]:62769 "EHLO loulou.fr.uu.net") by vger.rutgers.edu with ESMTP id ; Tue, 1 Feb 2000 05:00:30 -0500 Received: from CarlCox.iway.fr (carlcox.iway.fr [194.98.0.128]) by loulou.fr.uu.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA18162 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2000 15:11:00 +0100 (MET) Received: from MAIN ([194.98.253.70]) by CarlCox.iway.fr (8.9.3/8.8.7) with SMTP id PAA26817015 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2000 15:10:16 +0100 (MET) From: "Haim Tebeka" Cc: Subject: linux-kernel unsubscribe Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2000 15:11:39 -0800 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Disposition-notification-to: "Haim Tebeka" To: unlisted-recipients: ; (no To-header on input) Sender: owner-linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu Precedence: bulk X-Loop: majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing-dig -----Original Message----- From: owner-linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu [mailto:owner-linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu]On Behalf Of Jeremy Fitzhardinge Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2000 7:44 PM To: Russell King Cc: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu; autofs@linux.kernel.org Subject: Re: announce: updated autofs v4 patches; autofs-4.0.0-pre1 On 30-Jan-00 Russell King wrote: > Jeremy Fitzhardinge writes: >> Can you extract the relevent messages from syslog? Does it print something >> like "daemon (X, Y) kernel (X, Y)" after the "does not match daemon >> version" message? If not, then you're probably still using the old autofs >> module, since both are in 2.3 (select CONFIG_AUTOFS4 rather than >> CONFIG_AUTOFS). You'll also need to add an "alias autofs4 autofs" into your >> conf.modules if you're being modular. > > Is there any point in keeping the old code in the kernel, especially as the > v4 integration has broken it? Its redundant, but the existing code is well proven. It can be replaced when the replacement proves itself. Its basically a compromise to get the new code into 2.3 rather than pushing it out to 2.5. > (hint - the change to AUTOFS_PROTO_VERSION caused the old autofs to only > accept v4 of the daemon). OK. I'd only tested old binaries. The 3.1.3/4 source comes with its own copy of the header files, so it shouldn't see the new ones if you're recompiling it. J - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/