Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 28 Dec 2000 16:39:27 -0200 (BRST) | From | Marcelo Tosatti <> | Subject | Re: test13-pre5 |
| |
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> This still doesn't tell "sync()" about dirty pages (ie the "innd loses the > active file after a reboot" bug), but now the places that mark pages dirty > are under control. Next step..
Do you really want to split the per-address-space pages list in dirty and clean lists for 2.4 ?
Or do you think walking the current per-address-space page list searching for dirty pages and syncing them is ok?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |