[lkml]   [2000]   [Dec]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: kapm-idled : is this a bug?
    >> Agree that it is different. But it confuses people to have two
    >> idle-tasks. I suggest that we throw it one big pile, unless having a
    >> separate apm idle task has a purpose.
    > You can't do that.

    Sure you can, and it makes perfect sense.

    > Doing it this way is _way_ better for system
    > stability, because kidle-apmd sometimes dies due to APM
    > bug. kidle-apmd dying is recoverable error; swapper dieing is as fatal
    > as it can be.

    Good. Maybe the bugs will get fixed then. If the bugs are in
    the BIOS or motherboard hardware, we can have a blacklist.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.019 / U:0.636 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site