lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Dec]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.4.0-test13-pre1 lockup: run_task_queue or tty_io are wrong
On Sun, Dec 17, 2000 at 12:02:31PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 17 Dec 2000, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> >
> > How about using a sentinel list entry representing the current position
> > in run_task_queue's loop?
>
> Nope.
>
> There may be multiple concurrent run_task_queue's executing, so for now
> I've applied Andrew Morton's patch that most closely gets the old
> behaviour of having a private list.
>
> HOWEVER, this does need to be re-visited. The task-queue handling is
> potantially something that should be completely re-vamped in the future.
>
> Linus


Linus,

Try thinking about the work to do model (since task queues are so similiar)
Having to "kick" these things should be automatic in the kernel. I could
do a lot of cool stuff with this in there, manos aside.....

:-)

Jeff


>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.068 / U:0.248 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site