Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 15 Dec 2000 09:09:05 -0600 (CST) | From | Oliver Xymoron <> | Subject | Re: test13-pre1 changelog |
| |
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Oliver Xymoron (oxymoron@waste.org) wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > A 100ms delay sounds like some interrupt shut up or similar (and then > > > timer handling makes it limp along). > > > > Possibly related datapoint: after several days of uptime, my > > 2.4.0-test10pre? machine went into some sort of slow mode after coming > > back from suspend (and doing an /etc/init.d/networking restart). Symptoms > > seemed to be extra second or so setting up a TCP connection. Ping, etc., > > appeared to work just fine, no packet loss apparent, bandwidth looked good > > too. Sadly I had to do actual work that required zippy web access, so I > > rebooted rather than doing a thorough diagnostic. This is a VAIO with > > compiled in eepro100, no special networking options. > > Actually, I figured out what it was and I feel kind of stupid, and > suprised. I knew I should have tried rebooting before complaining. It > turns out it actually was something in my firewall rules, it appears that > for every logged packet there is something along the lines of a 100ms > delay that gets added on.
Hmmm, that's seems rather extreme - does it have to wait for klogd to get scheduled before it proceeds? I would expect the filtering to be down in the noise except at fairly high loads.
-- "Love the dolphins," she advised him. "Write by W.A.S.T.E.."
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |