[lkml]   [2000]   [Nov]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] document ECN in 2.4
    Oliver Xymoron wrote:
    > I'm still not sure why it's been decided not to do fallback or how this
    > whole situation is any different from path MTU discovery.

    It has:

    "Changes to make to the ECN RFC before it goes to proposed standard:
    * If the TCP host receives no response to a SYN packet sent
    with the TCP ECN_ECHO and CWR flags set, to indicate
    ECN-capability, then the sender should send its second
    SYN packet without these flags set. This is because
    there are several deployed TCP implementations that
    don't respond to SYN packets with these ECN-related flags set"
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:45    [W:0.022 / U:0.056 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site