Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalability by removal of lock_kernel()?(Was:Strange | Date | Sat, 4 Nov 2000 20:42:49 +0000 (GMT) | From | Alan Cox <> |
| |
> > Instead, if apache had just done the thing it wanted to do in the first > > place, the wake-one accept() semantics would have happened a hell of a > > lot earlier. > > counter-example: freebsd had wake-one semantics a few years before linux.
And Im sure apache authors can use the utsname() syscall 8) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |