[lkml]   [2000]   [Nov]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0"
    Andries Brouwer <> wrote:
    > int foo = 0; /* just for gcc */

    > when the initialization in fact is not necessary.

    Only for non-static foo.

    > It is a bad programming habit to depend on this zero initialization.
    > Indeed, very often, when you have a program that does something
    > you need to change it so that it does that thing a number of times.
    > Well, put a for- or while-loop around it. But wait! The second time
    > through the loop certain variables need to be reinitialized. Which ones?
    > The ones that were initialized explicitly in your first program.
    > Make the program into a function in a larger one. Same story.

    Again, this only applies to non-static variables. For static ones, they're
    initialised once only even when they go out of scope.

    > Saving a byte in the binary image is not very interesting.
    > Preserving information about the program is important.

    No information is lost.
    Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( )
    Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <>
    Home Page:
    PGP Key:
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:47    [W:0.019 / U:14.696 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site