[lkml]   [2000]   [Nov]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] get_empty_inode() cleanup

    On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, Tigran Aivazian wrote:

    > on the other hand, even 1 minute's thought reveals that making strict
    > logical separation between "consumers of inode with sb" and "consumers of
    > inode without sb" is probably worth the overhead of an extra function
    > call. So, I don't strongly feel about the above... maybe you are right :)

    It's not the with sb/without sb thing. Everything is much simpler -
    changing the get_empty_inode() prototype means mandatory changes in
    all 3rd-party code. Code freeze and all such...

    IOW, unmodified code doesn't break from the addition of helper function,
    but changing get_empty_inode() will break (albeit in a trivial way)
    every bloody filesystem out there. Not a problem for 2.5, but doing that
    now for no good reason...

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:47    [W:0.022 / U:5.584 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site