Messages in this thread | | | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | Date | 14 Nov 2000 11:42:42 -0800 |
| |
Followup to: <20001114152430.C2645@alcove.wittsend.com> By author: "Michael H. Warfield" <mhw@wittsend.com> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > Oh, I hate to add to a remark like that (OK, I lied, I love > trollbait...) > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 11:20:35AM -0800, Ben Ford wrote: > > Olaf Kirch wrote: > > > > sure request_module _does_not_ accept funky module names. Why allow > > > people to shoot themselves (and, by extension, all other Linux users > > > out there) in the foot? > > > I thought that was the whole purpose of Unix/Linux? > > True! Very true! Unix/Linux requires that the user shoot > themselves in the foot. Windows automates that process and does it > for the user, thus making foot shooting user friendly. :-) >
Seriously, though, I don't see any reason modprobe shouldn't accept funky filenames. There is a standard way to do that, which is to have an argument consisting of the string "--"; this indicates that any further arguments should be considered filenames and not options.
For example:
rm -- -foo # Delete a file named "-foo"
-hpa
-- <hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |