Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 1 Nov 2000 15:19:37 +0000 (GMT) | From | Tigran Aivazian <> | Subject | Re: Linux-2.4.0-test10 |
| |
On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > for microcode update as family=6? The manuals suggest that test for ">" is > > correct, i.e. that Intel will maintain compatibility with P6 wrt microcode > > update. > > > > Perhaps Richard can clarify this? > > Until we know what the preventium IV does on microcode behaviour it seems > wisest to test for == not >.
Ok, true, I agree with both you and Mikael Pettersson. Also, I couldn't find where in the volumeIII I saw references to ">", perhaps it wasn't in the docs but just in some sample Intel implementation (or maybe not).
Regards, Tigran
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |