| Date | Wed, 1 Nov 2000 17:11:58 -0700 | From | Nathan Paul Simons <> | Subject | Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? |
| |
On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 03:29:15PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > Please get your facts straight. > > The rest of this thread will show you that this is not a "Red Hat > thing". Connectiva, Mandrake, and others do the same thing. In fact > we choose the name "kgcc" to match the convention set by these other > distributions.
So other distro's did it too. Why did nobody complain till RedHat did it? Because no one else decided to use, as the default, a bleeding edge compiler that not only won't compile the kernel but won't even touch a lot of userspace code either.
-- Nathan Paul Simons, Junior Software Engineer for FSMLabs http://www.fsmlabs.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|