[lkml]   [2000]   [Oct]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Topic for discussion: OS Design (Dwayne C . Litzenberger) writes:

    You contradict yourself:


    > 3. Modules can very easily crash the whole kernel. This is because
    > each module does not get to run in its own protected memory space, as
    > it would i= n a well-designed microkernel.


    > very elegant operating systems, namely the Amiga's exec.library and
    > QNX's Neutrino (I'm sure you can name others), used microkernels, and
    > they were b= oth *very* efficient. However, there are some drawbacks
    > to microkernels that h= ave


    The AmigaOS (as I remember it from my past days) was fast because it
    had no memory protection between user and kernel space at all. So you
    could simply pass around message pointers without copying any data
    from kernel to user space.

    Yeah. Cool. Fast. Crashed like hell all the time you made one false

    Please, go and play with the other CS undergrads on Hurd. Or climb a


    Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen -- Geschaeftsfuehrer
    INTERMETA - Gesellschaft fuer Mehrwertdienste mbH

    Am Schwabachgrund 22 Fon.: 09131 / 50654-0
    D-91054 Buckenhof Fax.: 09131 / 50654-20
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:41    [W:0.019 / U:11.172 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site