lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Oct]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: __bad_udelay in 2.2.18pre15
    From
    Date
    Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br> writes:

    > 2.2.18pre15 defines udelay as (in file include/asm-i386/delay.h) :
    >
    > ...
    >
    > extern void __bad_udelay(void);
    >
    > ...
    >
    > #define udelay(n) (__builtin_constant_p(n) ? \
    > ((n) > 20000 ? __bad_udelay() : __const_udelay((n) *
    > 0x10c6ul)) : \
    > __udelay(n))
    >
    > ...
    >
    >
    > It seems __bad_udelay is not defined anywhere in the kernel source.

    Which is the whole point - you wouldn't want to call a bad function,
    would you? If you reference __bad_udelay() you are doing something
    wrong and should be using mdelay() instead.

    //Marcus
    --
    -------------------------------+------------------------------------
    Marcus Sundberg | http://www.stacken.kth.se/~mackan
    Royal Institute of Technology | Phone: +46 707 452062
    Stockholm, Sweden | E-Mail: mackan@stacken.kth.se
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:39    [W:3.395 / U:0.252 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site