[lkml]   [2000]   [Oct]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: {PATCH] Re: wasting time on page fault
    Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > > The assembler doesn't use nops for alignment -- it inserts longer
    > > instructions that are effectively nops, either 1 or two. For larger
    > > stretches, the assembler inserts a jmp itself for alignment.
    > Note that some of them are not very good no-ops. At least at some point
    > the "long" no-op was
    > lea 0x00000000(%esi),%esi
    > and you could cause AGI stalls and non-pairing with two of them in a row -
    > making the long no-op sequence potentially quite slow.

    When it must emit two no-ops in a row, it uses %esi and then %edi so
    there's no AGI from that. However, the assembler doesn't check
    preceding instructions to pick a decent register for the no-op
    instruction. Solution: avoid writing to %esi before an alignment op.

    > It may be that the special "lea" no-op is also recognized as such in newer
    > CPU's, but it wasn't in the early ones.

    Does Crusoe recognise that? :-)

    -- Jamie
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:39    [W:0.039 / U:24.172 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site