lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Jan]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From"Khimenko Victor" <>
DateThu, 6 Jan 2000 07:27:49 +0300 (MSK)
SubjectRe: time_t size: The year 2038 bug?
In <Pine.LNX.4.10.10001060426070.4684-100000@ace.ulyssis.student.kuleuven.ac.be> Chipzz (chipzz@Ace.ULYSSIS.Student.KULeuven.Ac.Be) wrote:
> Byte magazine had a really good article about Y2K and things like Y2038 and
> stuff, it even had a whole time-line about what kind of OS/processor would
> crash when. Too bad I can't find it anywhere, but I think it must have been
> in the July issue of 1998. I think I'll go take a look at their website and
> see if I can find it.
> Oh BTW, IIRC the Y2038 isn't just a linux issue, it's an issue for a lot of
> UNIX systems. But you had figured that allready I guess ;)

And not only Unix BTW... Windows's MFC libraries are using time_t extensively
for example.




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55    [from the cache]
©2003-2008