[lkml]   [2000]   [Jan]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: time_t size: The year 2038 bug?
On Thu, Jan 06, 2000 at 05:17:55PM +1030, Glen Turner wrote:
> > > ANSI/ISO C defines time_t as a signed arithmetic type, so
> > > such a change would break correct code.
> >
> > Are you positive?
> I checked and you are right. ANSI C just requires that it
> be an arithmetic type [7.12.1] (and by other rules in the
> document, a *standard* arithmetic type).

Quoting POSIX Programmers Guide, 1st Ed., page 133:

The type time_t is defined in <time.h>. While it is typically an unsigned
long, it can be a double or long double.

Looks as if POSIX and ANSI are (again) at odds...

Dominik Kubla

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55    [W:0.087 / U:0.736 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site