Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 6 Jan 2000 08:08:33 +0100 (CET) | From | Tony den Haan <> | Subject | Re: First draft list of 2.3.x "Things to fix" |
| |
> On 5 Jan 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > >ext3 is not going in, but reiserfs might. Unlike ext3, raiserfs actually > >has gotten a lot of real-world testing: SuSE seems to be using it in > >production environments with good results. It's still 2.2.x-based, so it > >may not make it, but it is at least a potential thing. huh? i've been using both for a while now, both feel good. a journaling reiser is not (much) faster than ext3, but seems easier to implement/maintain since it's ext2 based. they both recovered nicely after crashes. does this mean "forget ext3"? can't they coexist? does fine here
tony
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |