![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
> Hannu Savolainen wrote: > > > > Another approach is making time_t to be 32 bit unsigned int which gives > > about 70 more years. > > ANSI/ISO C defines time_t as a signed arithmetic type, so > such a change would break correct code. Are you positive? I'm 99.9% sure it doesn't specify that it be signed. Don't misunderstand the ability to return '((time_t)-1)' as requiring that the type be signed. DS - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||