[lkml]   [2000]   [Jan]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [linux-usb] __initcall diff, version 2

On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, Randy Dunlap wrote:

> Hi,
> I like the idea of this __initcall patch for USB.
> However, I've searched other 2.3.4x drivers and found
> very little use of __initcall.
> Is this because __initcall is relatively new, or that
> there are problems with it? If problems, what kinds
> of problems?

Because it's new. :)

I am slowly moving drivers over to initcall -- you'll notice a couple
more in the 2.3.41 patch.

The only "gotcha" is initialization order -- if initialization order is
critical, you must guarantee that via Makefile link order.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [W:0.036 / U:32.020 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site