[lkml]   [2000]   [Jan]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [linux-usb] __initcall diff, version 2

    On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, Randy Dunlap wrote:

    > Hi,
    > I like the idea of this __initcall patch for USB.
    > However, I've searched other 2.3.4x drivers and found
    > very little use of __initcall.
    > Is this because __initcall is relatively new, or that
    > there are problems with it? If problems, what kinds
    > of problems?

    Because it's new. :)

    I am slowly moving drivers over to initcall -- you'll notice a couple
    more in the 2.3.41 patch.

    The only "gotcha" is initialization order -- if initialization order is
    critical, you must guarantee that via Makefile link order.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [W:0.023 / U:158.616 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site