lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Jan]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.3.41 is dep_bool officially broken? :)
On Mon, 31 Jan 2000, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
> No. It is (according to current standard) misuse of dep_bool.
> Look in my postings to l-k with subj: "2.3.41 config: suggested [PATCH]"
>
> Simple changing that in one place may brake some others.
> Maybe it is good reasom for creating a new config function ?
> How to name it ?
> dep_bool_mod ?
> dep_bool_nomod ?

No. A dependency is a dependency, pure and simple. It should not
matter whether the dependency is marked as a module or not.

Jeff




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [W:0.133 / U:0.088 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site