Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 31 Jan 2000 13:22:24 -0600 (CST) | From | Jeff Garzik <> | Subject | Re: 2.3.41 is dep_bool officially broken? :) |
| |
On Mon, 31 Jan 2000, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote: > No. It is (according to current standard) misuse of dep_bool. > Look in my postings to l-k with subj: "2.3.41 config: suggested [PATCH]" > > Simple changing that in one place may brake some others. > Maybe it is good reasom for creating a new config function ? > How to name it ? > dep_bool_mod ? > dep_bool_nomod ?
No. A dependency is a dependency, pure and simple. It should not matter whether the dependency is marked as a module or not.
Jeff
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |