lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Jan]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: linux-kernel-digest V1 #113
Date
From
Steve Underwood <steveu@coppice.org> said:
> Robert Dinse wrote:

[...]

> > Since the scheduler is adaptive, the new code, other than the
> > test, is only going to executed under the heavy load conditions.
> > Surely the test isn't 1kbyte or anywhere close to it?

> A partially good point, but flawed.

> In the reasonable load case most of the new code won't necessarily get
> into the cache, so it should have little impact.

But one instruction more to fetch from RAM is a _huge_ cost, relatively
speaking. There is also the cost of making sure this whole machinery works
right each time it is tweaked.

> Now consider the high load case. A high load means the machine is being
> crippled by multiple number crunching activities creating a compute
> requirement beyond the system's reasonable means. [...]

And this being so, no amount of tweaking will fix it. Leave it alone, that
is simpler and has the same result: You need a a bigger machine.
--
Horst von Brand vonbrand@sleipnir.valparaiso.cl
Casilla 9G, Viña del Mar, Chile +56 32 672616


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site