[lkml]   [2000]   [Jan]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Constant byteorder macros.
> > b/w/d would make more sense in PCI nomenclature. Too late 
> Why's it too late? Are these names specified in the PCI spec, or just the
> Linux code?

In Linux. The b/w/d is the PCI specification "byte word doubleword" sequence

> We could add {write,read}{8,16,32,64} routines now, #define the old
> read[bwl] accordingly, and in early 2.5 start to warn about the use of the old
> versions.

How about fixing the 2.3.x bugs and getting 2.4 out before that ?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [W:0.038 / U:3.652 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site