lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Jan]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Udelay and new CPUs

On 21-Jan-00 H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>
>> On 21-Jan-00 H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> > There are no "x86 cycles" on Crusoe, so it counts VLIW cycles. In
>> > fact, on TM5400 it counts *nominal* cycles, since the actual cycle
>> > length is variable (due to LongRun).
>>
>> So RDTSC is useless for getting consistent udelay delays.
>>
>
> No, on the contrary. For a 700 MHz TM5400 the TSC will always count at
> 700 MHz even if the CPU decides that it currently only needs to run at,
> say, 175 MHz.

Apparently if you *emphasize* words, they become invisible to my eyes.
Sigh, maybe I should start reading with my lips moving...

J

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [W:1.119 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site