lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Jan]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: Constant byteorder macros.
    Date
    Followup to:  <20000121154727.A2247@ZhengHe.augustin.thierry>
    By author: Francois-Rene Rideau <fare@tunes.org>
    In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
    >
    > Anyway, in such cases as this one where a satisfying patch is available,
    > it costs more to argue about the issue than to apply the patch. Doesn't it?
    >

    No, this isn't a cleanup. This is going backwards toward a
    harder-to-read kernel. __builtin_constant_p() is so widely used in
    the kernel that saying that we should avoid it for <instance foo> is
    silly. Use it throughout and make the code easier to read, thanks.

    -hpa
    --
    <hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
    "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [W:0.019 / U:30.212 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site