lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Jan]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Constant byteorder macros.
Date
Followup to:  <20000121154727.A2247@ZhengHe.augustin.thierry>
By author: Francois-Rene Rideau <fare@tunes.org>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> Anyway, in such cases as this one where a satisfying patch is available,
> it costs more to argue about the issue than to apply the patch. Doesn't it?
>

No, this isn't a cleanup. This is going backwards toward a
harder-to-read kernel. __builtin_constant_p() is so widely used in
the kernel that saying that we should avoid it for <instance foo> is
silly. Use it throughout and make the code easier to read, thanks.

-hpa
--
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [W:0.143 / U:0.124 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site