[lkml]   [2000]   [Jan]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Interesting analysis of linux kernel threading by IBM
    In <022201bf62b0$81cee7d0$1f0104c0@maticad> Davide Libenzi ( wrote:
    > Wednesday, January 19, 2000 10:25 PM
    > David Lang <> wrote :
    >> This has probably been asked before, but how difficult would it be to have
    >> two different schedulers available as compile time options? that way they
    >> system could be optimized for the expected load.

    > Hi David,

    > my patch has great performance ( 80% with 300 tasks ) with a lot of tasks
    > and low overhead ( 1.5% with 2 tasks ).
    > And my patch has 0.00 optimizations about CPU fetches and Co.
    > IMVHO 1-1.5 % of overhead is a price the we can afford given the performace
    > with many tasks.
    > My patch equals the current implementation with 8 tasks.

    Even 8 tasks is unusual for Desktop. Usually there are 2-3 active tasks.
    On other hand Desktop usually is idle all the time anyway so 1.5% looks
    affordable for sure. And for server with LOTS of active processes (Apache,
    *SQL, etc) it can be real win.

    Where I can find your patch ?

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [W:0.021 / U:2.824 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site