This message generated a parse failure. Raw output follows here. Please use 'back' to navigate. From devnull@lkml.org Fri Apr 26 18:02:27 2024 Received: from lml.valinux.com (postfix@lml.valinux.com [198.186.203.19]) by herbie.ucs.indiana.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA04291 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 15:57:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from vger.rutgers.edu (vger.rutgers.edu [128.6.190.2]) by lml.valinux.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C718478F07; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 01:41:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by vger.rutgers.edu via listexpand id ; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 19:32:16 -0500 Received: by vger.rutgers.edu id ; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 19:09:33 -0500 Received: from mplspop1.mpls.uswest.net ([204.147.80.3]:4797 "HELO mplspop1.mpls.uswest.net") by vger.rutgers.edu with SMTP id ; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 18:37:26 -0500 Received: (qmail 903 invoked by alias); 20 Jan 2000 23:03:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 23871 invoked by uid 0); 20 Jan 2000 23:00:00 -0000 Received: from 6401pppd87.mpls.uswest.net (HELO uswest.net) (63.224.23.87) by mplspop1.mpls.uswest.net with SMTP; 20 Jan 2000 23:00:00 -0000 Message-Id: <38879385.96D0FBE9@uswest.net> Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 17:00:22 -0600 From: johnforde Reply-To: johnforde@mentalengineering.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 (Macintosh; U; PPC) Mime-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: [Fwd: [patch-2.3.40-pre6] nfds limit for poll() raised to 131 million (is that enough?)] Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------C3CC009A4915D861C34340E3" Sender: owner-linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu Precedence: bulk X-Loop: majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing-dig This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------C3CC009A4915D861C34340E3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --------------C3CC009A4915D861C34340E3 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: Delivered-To: crday@mail-mpls.uswest.net Received: (qmail 60745 invoked by uid 0); 20 Jan 2000 21:15:08 -0000 Received: from mail4.uswest.net (204.147.80.22) by mplspop4.mpls.uswest.net with SMTP; 20 Jan 2000 21:15:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 19187 invoked by alias); 20 Jan 2000 21:14:59 -0000 Delivered-To: crday@uswest.net Received: (qmail 18884 invoked by uid 0); 20 Jan 2000 21:14:53 -0000 Received: from rdsl18-gw.ddsl.mr.net (HELO gw.linespeed.com) (137.192.134.70) by mail4.uswest.net with SMTP; 20 Jan 2000 21:14:51 -0000 Received: from lml.valinux.com (postfix@lml.valinux.com [198.186.203.19]) by gw.linespeed.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA21102 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 15:14:43 -0600 (CST) Received: from vger.rutgers.edu (vger.rutgers.edu [128.6.190.2]) by lml.valinux.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEE065BC99; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 04:01:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by vger.rutgers.edu via listexpand id ; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 06:52:12 -0500 Received: by vger.rutgers.edu id ; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 05:24:34 -0500 Received: from scol.london.sco.COM ([150.126.1.48]:3724 "HELO sco.COM") by vger.rutgers.edu with SMTP id ; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 04:20:17 -0500 Received: from tyne.london.sco.COM(150.126.1.103), claiming to be "tyne.sco.com" via SMTP by scol.london.sco.COM, id smtpdAAAa004m6; Thu Jan 20 09:19:41 2000 Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 09:18:33 +0000 (GMT) From: Tigran Aivazian X-Sender: tigran@tyne.london.sco.com To: Bill Wendling Cc: Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: Re: [patch-2.3.40-pre6] nfds limit for poll() raised to 131 million (is that enough?) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu Precedence: bulk X-Loop: majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing-dig On Thu, 20 Jan 2000, Tigran Aivazian wrote: > Does Alan have any preference or are we all working in the wrong direction > and he prefers kmalloc/vmalloc split (or some other) idea? For example, some other idea may be to create a pollfd_cache slab cache at system initialization and have poll() allocate/free objects from it as needed. May even be faster than what we currently have? Just an idea, Tigran. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ --------------C3CC009A4915D861C34340E3-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/