This message generated a parse failure. Raw output follows here. Please use 'back' to navigate. From devnull@lkml.org Sat Apr 27 00:02:31 2024 Received: from lml.valinux.com (postfix@lml.valinux.com [198.186.203.19]) by herbie.ucs.indiana.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA10387 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 12:41:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from vger.rutgers.edu (vger.rutgers.edu [128.6.190.2]) by lml.valinux.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F7795BE9F; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 22:37:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by vger.rutgers.edu via listexpand id ; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 19:46:52 -0500 Received: by vger.rutgers.edu id ; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 19:14:39 -0500 Received: from mplspop1.mpls.uswest.net ([204.147.80.3]:1817 "HELO mplspop1.mpls.uswest.net") by vger.rutgers.edu with SMTP id ; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 18:55:42 -0500 Received: (qmail 13122 invoked by alias); 20 Jan 2000 23:10:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 22043 invoked by uid 0); 20 Jan 2000 22:59:00 -0000 Received: from 6401pppd87.mpls.uswest.net (HELO uswest.net) (63.224.23.87) by mplspop1.mpls.uswest.net with SMTP; 20 Jan 2000 22:59:00 -0000 Message-Id: <38879349.CE8B56D5@uswest.net> Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 16:59:22 -0600 From: johnforde Reply-To: johnforde@mentalengineering.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 (Macintosh; U; PPC) Mime-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: [Fwd: 2.2.14 feels slow and non-interactive.] Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------0DEDED95906C403F576F8805" Sender: owner-linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu Precedence: bulk X-Loop: majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing-dig This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------0DEDED95906C403F576F8805 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --------------0DEDED95906C403F576F8805 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: Delivered-To: crday@mail-mpls.uswest.net Received: (qmail 87273 invoked by uid 0); 20 Jan 2000 21:29:55 -0000 Received: from mail5.uswest.net (204.147.80.23) by mplspop4.mpls.uswest.net with SMTP; 20 Jan 2000 21:29:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 16264 invoked by alias); 20 Jan 2000 21:29:55 -0000 Delivered-To: crday@uswest.net Received: (qmail 16092 invoked by uid 0); 20 Jan 2000 21:29:51 -0000 Received: from rdsl18-gw.ddsl.mr.net (HELO gw.linespeed.com) (137.192.134.70) by mail5.uswest.net with SMTP; 20 Jan 2000 21:29:51 -0000 Received: from lml.valinux.com (postfix@lml.valinux.com [198.186.203.19]) by gw.linespeed.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA21112 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 15:29:46 -0600 (CST) Received: from vger.rutgers.edu (vger.rutgers.edu [128.6.190.2]) by lml.valinux.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 671145BCBF; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 04:28:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by vger.rutgers.edu via listexpand id ; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 06:47:05 -0500 Received: by vger.rutgers.edu id ; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 06:07:57 -0500 Received: from ousrvr.oulu.fi ([130.231.240.1]:45487 "EHLO oulu.fi") by vger.rutgers.edu with ESMTP id ; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 05:48:45 -0500 Received: from paju.oulu.fi (root@paju.oulu.fi [130.231.240.20]) by oulu.fi (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA23821; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 12:48:41 +0200 (EET) Received: from paju.oulu.fi (tutoivon@paju.oulu.fi [130.231.240.20]) by paju.oulu.fi (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA4400894; Thu, 20 Jan 2000 12:48:40 +0200 (EET) Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 12:48:40 +0200 From: Tuukka Toivonen X-Sender: tutoivon@paju.oulu.fi To: "Mike A. Harris" Cc: Linux Kernel mailing list Subject: Re: 2.2.14 feels slow and non-interactive. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu Precedence: bulk X-Loop: majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing-dig On Wed, 19 Jan 2000, Mike A. Harris wrote: > I've been using 2.2.14 since it came out, and it has had a Me too. > sluggish feel to it at times. When switching from X to the > console and back often I have to wait anywhere up to 5-10 seconds Me too. However, this has always happened, even with 2.0.x kernels. It didn't happened with the original X that came with Slackware96, but when I upgraded X then it always started freezing the console for a while after switching back to X. Related? i think think so. Kernel problem? I don't think that either. But I could be wrong. In any case, advices are appreciated. > up to 5-10 seconds as well for it to open up. It seems as if it > is pulling it out of swap space or something. X starts up slow Is the swap actually used ("free/top")? Does hard disk get read (the drive light)? i have here pentium 120 / 24 MiB, S3 Trio32 mirocrystal. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ --------------0DEDED95906C403F576F8805-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/