![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Thursday, January 20, 2000 3:14 PM
Peter Rival <frival@zk3.dec.com> wrote :
> No offense, but it is this type of thinking that will keep Linux out of
the
> datacenter. What you must say it is not a typical (or realistic) workload
_for
> me_. Hundreds of tasks is trivial here - we have systems running with
well over
> 100 users actively working that are two or more generations old (that's a
much
> bigger thing for Alpha than for Intel). On our newer systems we fully
expect
> hundreds, if not thousands, of tasks. The more commercially accepted
Linux
> becomes, the more common large configurations are going to be, and we
should be
> thinking about that now - not when we're being shot all over creation for
not
> doing what everyone said we could (ala WinNT).
>
I can only agree here given that there are practically no costs to sustain
under normal situations.
And improvements are concrete under high load.
Cheers,
Davide.
--
Debian, the freedom in freedom.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||