![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Leos Bitto wrote: [cut] > The bug I was reporting is only int vs. long in .h vs .c. Alan already got > back to me and promised fixing it in 2.2.15pre4. Which is bad, since I'm changing the same part as well. [cut] > So why are you submitting it to 2.2 which is supposed to be stable? Why, do you think, does one submit a bug-fix? I did not (knowingly) change the (broken!) write-support - I submitted a number of fixes to the read-support in order to at least get THAT PART into a more stable state. The QNX4 filesystem was so broken it should IMHO never have entered 2.2.x - since you have it enabled, you ought to know that it was pretty unusable up till now (but as of 2.2.15pre3 you can at last READ from a QNX fs all right)! BTW, why do you insist on having QNX write-support enabled in your kernel? Anders - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:56 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||