lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Jan]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Replacing __SMP__ by CONFIG_SMP globally in linux-2.3.39.
Niels Kristian Bech Jensen wrote:

>> > So, if such a patch goes into the kernel, module makefiles now have
>> > to be modified to define "CONFIG_SMP" instead of "__SMP__" which,
>> > since they may not even have a "configuration", becomes just another
>> > PITA to support "change for the sake of change".
>> >
>> The purpose is to get rid of what I consider an ugly hack. Since
>> CONFIG_SMP is a proper config option, it and only it should be used IMHO.
>> What is the purpose of having a config option symbol (CONFIG_SMP) define
>> another symbol (__SMP__) ?
>>

> The first to define a symbol makes the rule. How do you claim that
> "CONFIG_SMP" is any more `proper` than "__SMP__" ?

For one, the build-dependency system of the kernel can handle CONFIG_SMP.

Greetings,
Arjan van de Ven


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55    [W:0.117 / U:0.316 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site