lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Jan]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Replacing __SMP__ by CONFIG_SMP globally in linux-2.3.39.
    Niels Kristian Bech Jensen wrote:

    >> > So, if such a patch goes into the kernel, module makefiles now have
    >> > to be modified to define "CONFIG_SMP" instead of "__SMP__" which,
    >> > since they may not even have a "configuration", becomes just another
    >> > PITA to support "change for the sake of change".
    >> >
    >> The purpose is to get rid of what I consider an ugly hack. Since
    >> CONFIG_SMP is a proper config option, it and only it should be used IMHO.
    >> What is the purpose of having a config option symbol (CONFIG_SMP) define
    >> another symbol (__SMP__) ?
    >>

    > The first to define a symbol makes the rule. How do you claim that
    > "CONFIG_SMP" is any more `proper` than "__SMP__" ?

    For one, the build-dependency system of the kernel can handle CONFIG_SMP.

    Greetings,
    Arjan van de Ven


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55    [W:0.020 / U:29.980 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site