[lkml]   [1999]   [Sep]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch] longstanding chksum patch

    On Thu, 9 Sep 1999, Linus Torvalds wrote:

    > > Some month ago I pointed out that the checksum 686 can buffer overflow if
    > > the start of the buf&1 is != 0.
    > And some months ago somebody pointed out that it wasn't true. I don't know
    > who is right.

    also some months ago somebody (who happened to be the implementor of that
    unrolled 686 loop) pointed out that the 128-byte unrolling is suboptimal
    as well.

    -- mingo

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:0.018 / U:0.208 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site