[lkml]   [1999]   [Sep]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] longstanding chksum patch

On Thu, 9 Sep 1999, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> > Some month ago I pointed out that the checksum 686 can buffer overflow if
> > the start of the buf&1 is != 0.
> And some months ago somebody pointed out that it wasn't true. I don't know
> who is right.

also some months ago somebody (who happened to be the implementor of that
unrolled 686 loop) pointed out that the 128-byte unrolling is suboptimal
as well.

-- mingo

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:0.060 / U:3.652 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site