[lkml]   [1999]   [Sep]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Problem allocating DMA memory
    Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
    > You misread the patch. The counting is purely optional, and I'll remove
    > it if people don't like it. The really useful part of the patch is that
    > dmaable pages go on a separate list from non-dma. It's a simple, obvious
    > extension of the existing mechanism that's easy to get right -- whereas
    > putting pages on the back of the list is going to be a lot more
    > subtle.

    Ok. We're talking basically the same thing and to be honest, I prefer
    your strategy to mine. Yours is easier to optimise.

    I'd remove the counting if there's no point to it.

    -- Jamie

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:0.018 / U:71.188 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site