[lkml]   [1999]   [Sep]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Problem allocating DMA memory
Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> You misread the patch. The counting is purely optional, and I'll remove
> it if people don't like it. The really useful part of the patch is that
> dmaable pages go on a separate list from non-dma. It's a simple, obvious
> extension of the existing mechanism that's easy to get right -- whereas
> putting pages on the back of the list is going to be a lot more
> subtle.

Ok. We're talking basically the same thing and to be honest, I prefer
your strategy to mine. Yours is easier to optimise.

I'd remove the counting if there's no point to it.

-- Jamie

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:0.048 / U:6.184 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site