lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Sep]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: USB state change notification to user space
On Sat, Sep 04 1999, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
> > A fourth possibility is some sort of signal, which makes sense in a way --
> > do we want the application to a) ask if there is a new device, b) wait for
> > a new device, or c) be notified that there is a new device? It wouldn't be
> > hard (I think) to write a callback function for the USB handler that an
> > application can register with (i.e. a signal). It seems to me that option
> > c) is the best, since it maps to the bus behavior best.
>
> Obviously, c) is the best, however it's difficult to do with signals.
> Allocating a signal specifically for this is kind of a waste. Are you
> thinking perhaps registering which singal should be raised by an ioctl?
>
> I was hoping to get something similar to c) with a poll interface. That
> way it can block in poll or poll the fd along with other fd's the
> program may need.

Someone recently mentioned doing poll on a proc entry, that might
be a solution here as well.

--
* Jens Axboe <axboe@image.dk>
* Linux CD-ROM Maintainer
* http://www.kernel.dk

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:0.025 / U:2.784 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site