Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Solaris 100K TCP connections, good example? was:[Fwd: [Fwd: | Date | Tue, 28 Sep 1999 10:23:39 +0100 (BST) | From | Alan Cox <> |
| |
> in that case, every filesystem iget operation has to wade through 100K+ > inodes to find an inode (imagine the length of the hash lists in a 256 > bucket hash table!). every d_lookup has to do the same. each inode is as
So dont use a 256 bucket hash table. Dave has some nice 2.2. patches for the hashes (and the socket hashes want to be bigger too)
> go to zero until the socket closes (bad for high-latency connections or if > SO_LINGER is set). in current kernels, the VM system can't even ask for > inode memory back after it's been allocated to the inode cache. > > think 2G of RAM is enough? :) maybe for the buffers alone...
Even factoring those in its about 1Gig for the kernel side structures.
Alan
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |