Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Tue, 28 Sep 1999 22:20:31 +0200 (MET_DST) | | From | David Weinehall <> | | Subject | Re: bug in 2.3.18ac9 net/Config.in |
| |
On 28 Sep 1999, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> >>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Molina <tmolina@home.com> writes: > > Thomas> On 28 Sep 1999, Jes Sorensen wrote: > >> Except that it requires that the people who write the patches > >> actually use these tools. There is no way I am going to waste time > >> running menuconfig/xconfig before shipping something. > > Thomas> You seem to be saying you're going to make changes which work > Thomas> with config, and you don't care if they break > Thomas> menuconfig/xconfig? You're not even going to test the > Thomas> changes? That seems akin to someone saying they want to make > Thomas> changes which optomize running on an Alpha. Furthermore, they > Thomas> don't care if it breaks x86 because that is a stupid > Thomas> architecture. > > make config & oldconfig are the references here, there have always > been problems with the others. The Alpha is known to work and I try to > test my changes on it.
I've _never_ had a single problem with menuconfig.
I'd guess that most people outside the die-hard haxxor-'133+ uses menuconfig & xconfig. They are simply more convenient and easy to handle.
If you have problems, REPORT them for the holy penguin's sake, don't just complain about them being buggy...
/David Weinehall _ _ // David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se> /> Northern lights wander \\ // Project MCA Linux hacker // Dance across the winter sky // \> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ </ Full colour fire </
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |