Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 28 Sep 1999 21:48:49 +0200 (CEST) | From | Andrea Arcangeli <> | Subject | Re: possible spinlock optimizations |
| |
On Tue, 28 Sep 1999, Chuck Lever wrote:
>besides, making the IRQ-masked spinlocks interruptible might mean that >we're more likely to interrupt a deadlock via SysRq, right?
Yes.
Andrea
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |