[lkml]   [1999]   [Sep]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Some tests (Was: Probable bug in handling disabled network interfaces (2.2.12))
On Mon, 20 Sep 1999 wrote:

> Seems, the confusion is related to the fact, that interface has two modes
> looking absolutely similarly (except for entry in /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/):
> no IP and addressless IP. ifconfig makes it addressless,
> magic sequence with adding and deleting ?rap really disables IP.

I think the biggest confusion comes from the fact that ip-adresses are not
bound to interfaces, but to the host.
When I assign an ip to i.e. dummy0 (and interface is up), I would expect
it to work from inside this host, but not from the outside, as I
would expect an address on eth0 not to be reachable on eth1 unless I use
ip_forward==1 .

After painfull hours of debugging I now think I know how it works (or not
works in my setup here), but for me it's a bug (some may call it a ugly



The Internet treats censorship as a routing problem, and routes around it.
(John Gilmore on

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:54    [W:0.080 / U:9.000 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site