Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 19 Sep 1999 13:13:33 +0300 (EEST) | From | Sergey Kubushin <> | Subject | Re: 2.2.13 & gcc-2.95.1 |
| |
On Sat, 18 Sep 1999, Alan Cox wrote:
> > bunch of assembler warnings during the build? May be those warnings can > > explain (at least partially) why don't the resulting kernel behave? > > Understand something here. If 2.2.14 or 2.2.15 builds perfectly with gcc 2.95.1 > I will be happy. I want it to build and work with all the new compilers. Equally > from a production perspective right now we know it doesnt work, right now > it hasn't had sufficient testing with the patches. > > All Im trying to say is - if you are building a kernel to go out on CD, to > run on a web server, professionally for a client etc - be aware that 2.95* > is the wrong thing to build it with. If you want to build with 2.95.1 on > non critical machines and help change this then great,
OK, I do have several machines which I can experiment on. My next CD is not that close yet to be afraid of having a currently buggy kernel. Anyway, my next distribution will hopefully be built 'round 2.4.x...
So please do expect detailed bug reports for 2.2.x & gcc-2.95.1. Sure enough, I'll do my best to help you in bug hunting.
=========================================================================== Sergey Kubushin aka the Tamer < > The impossible we do immediately. e-mail: ksi@ksi-linux.com SK320-RIPE < > Miracles require 24-hour notice. ===========================================================================
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |