Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 14 Sep 1999 14:25:51 -0400 (EDT) | From | George <> | Subject | Re: Accountability |
| |
On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, Colin McCormack wrote:
>>>>A suitable fashion means someone submits it to Linus and promises to >maintain >>>> it and fix it. >>> >>> Is this documented somewhere? >> >> 5 years of tradition > >I take that to mean `no'.
I take that to mean you haven't read linux-kernel.
>Good input filtering? I've never seen anyone be told `no' because their >patches were too large (in fact, as far as I can see, large slabs of egcs >are farmed out to largely independent groups, as has effectively happened >with ISDN under Linux), nor because one of the developers' machines >doesn't have bz2.
Input filtering isn't by size, it's content.
>Additionally, coins don't get stuck on `no' for things like GGI.
They seem to be doing just fine.
You have that air of contemptuousness about your posts...
-George Greer
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |