Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 14 Sep 1999 10:15:18 -0700 (MST) | From | Tom Rini <> | Subject | Re: Accountability |
| |
On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, Colin McCormack wrote:
> > Colin McCormack wrote: > >>Is there a good reason, or indeed any reason, why epckpt isn't in the kernel > >> right now? > > > > "Feature freeze". > > Since version 2.2.1 ?
Well no. But there is one again now. And seeing as the author (who may have something to say about all this, now cc'ed) doesn't currently have a version up for recent 2.2.x or 2.3.x, it's too late for this dev cycle (most likely).
> > Wait until 2.5 unless your feature will really change the life of > > millions. > > The patch, a relatively simple one, has been around since 2.0.36. That's a > year at least. 2.4 is scheduled for release at the end of this year, it may > slip.
Relatively simple? Checkpointing is a rather complex thing to do, as I understand it. And, I'd almost be willing to be once that patch hit the masses, so to speak, a few bugs would show up.
> Is two years lead time really what you'd expect from a Bazaar development > system?
Well, you can't sit around hopping to be noticed, you gotta go around and talk to people.
> >> I'll wait for replies before I suggest a kernel fork. > > > > Keeping the patch up to date with developing kernels is always a nice > > thing to do. > > That's some feedback. Thanks.
Getting the authors opinion on things is good too. :)
--- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |