[lkml]   [1999]   [Sep]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: spin_lock and linux philosophy question...
On Mon, 13 Sep 1999, Robert Dinse wrote:

> On Mon, 13 Sep 1999, Momchil Velikov wrote:
> >
> > You can also use a spinlock in an interrupt handler, where you can't sleep at
> > all.
> >
> > Regards,
> > -velco
> Are there ever cases where you lock outside of interrupts but expect code
> inside of an interrupt handler to unlock? Or conversely, cases where you lock
> during an interrupt, do some preliminary work, then return expecting code
> outside to unlock?

Not with spinlocks. Which is to say that:

a) a process may never block while holding a spinlock
b) an interrupt context may never end while still holding a

I'm not too sure what the debugging spinlock code does wrt these
invariants, but checking a local lock depth wouldn't be too difficult.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:0.123 / U:2.008 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site