lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1999]   [Sep]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] longstanding chksum patch

On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

> >> - testl %esi, %esi
> >> + clc
> >
> >you've just slowed the code down. clc does not pair. testl %esi, %esi
> >does.
>
> My machine (PII) was faster with clc.

I'm talking about the PII as well, clc _is_ slower. I would suspect your
benchmarking method is broken or nondeterministic?

-- mingo


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:0.035 / U:0.392 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site