Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: /proc/cpuinfo verbiage differ unnecessarily between ports... | From | Andreas Schwab <> | Date | 01 Sep 1999 10:44:57 +0200 |
| |
Steve Dodd <dirk@loth.demon.co.uk> writes:
|> On Tue, Aug 31, 1999 at 05:17:23PM -0700, david parsons wrote: |> |> > Why not? I'd say that the contents of /proc/cpuinfo would be very |> > interesting to tools, because it's what the operating system thinks |> > it's running on. |> |> Would it not be more sensible to introduce a syscall or some such thing to |> do it?
How about extending sysinfo(2)?
-- Andreas Schwab "And now for something schwab@suse.de completely different." SuSE GmbH, Schanzäckerstr. 10, D-90443 Nürnberg
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |