[lkml]   [1999]   [Sep]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: NFSv3: Summary of recent bugfixes/updates to the NFSv3 patches...
    "Steven N. Hirsch" <> writes:

    > On Tue, 31 Aug 1999, Steven N. Hirsch wrote:
    > > On 31 Aug 1999, Trond Myklebust wrote:
    > >
    > > > The current version of the NFSv3 patches is 0.11.6. It should patch
    > > > cleanly against stock linux-2.2.10, 2.2.11 and 2.2.12.
    > >
    > > Will this apply cleanly to an otherwise-stock 2.2.12 kernel with HJ Lu's
    > > server patches previously added?
    > Following up on my own post. After fixing three small conflicts, they do
    > apply over HJ's. However, lockd still ooopses immediately when exercising
    > locks against another server. This is the problem I reported weeks ago.

    Are HJ's lockd patches really required on linux-2.2.12? As far as I
    can see, 'nfsd-2.2.7-1.lock.patch' is already in the kernel.

    'nfsd-2.2.7-2.lockd.patch' should in most cases not be necessary, but
    if you do prefer to start lockd by hand rather than letting NFS do it,
    then as far as I can see, the only thing that fails is the patch to
    'svc.c'. You need to add

    do_lockdctl = NULL;

    to 'cleanup_module(void)'.

    As for the rest of HJ's 2.2.7 patches, I can't see any conflicts with
    NFSv3. Where are you seeing them?


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:0.020 / U:12.144 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site