[lkml]   [1999]   [Sep]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: /proc/cpuinfo verbiage differ unnecessarily between ports...
    On Tue, Aug 31, 1999 at 05:17:23PM -0700, david parsons wrote:

    > Why not? I'd say that the contents of /proc/cpuinfo would be very
    > interesting to tools, because it's what the operating system thinks
    > it's running on.

    Would it not be more sensible to introduce a syscall or some such thing to
    do it? Surely having the kernel format up nice tables for /proc, and then
    applications reading and parsing it all back again, is a bit pointless. Leave
    the files in /proc for humans. We've got sysctl for tunable parameters,
    is there a parallel that could be used for read-only info?

    "Damaged people are dangerous, they know they can survive"

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:0.025 / U:75.148 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site