[lkml]   [1999]   [Aug]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    Subject/proc/cpuinfo verbiage differ unnecessarily between ports...
    Ronald Cole writes:
    >Michael K. Johnson writes:
    >>The problem you report will be fixed in the procps-2.0.3 release, which
    >>I expect to make as soon as I catch up reading my procps-bugs email. :-)
    >It's bug #4554 and contains my stab at a patch. Calculating the
    >number of processors, as I did, may be Intel specific, though. I
    >think I saw a post on the kernel list that had the string "cpu" where
    >"processor" should be in /proc/cpuinfo. If that's the case, you'll
    >have to find a portable way to count the number of cpus.

    Yes, indeed! I just found a spare moment and checked get_cpuinfo() in
    arch/i386/kernel/setup.c and arch/sparc64/kernel/setup.c and my memory
    didn't fail me, unfortunately.

    I can't think of any good argument for keeping "processor" for the
    i386 and "cpu" for the sparc64. Someone should probably fix all the
    different ports so that the verbiage is consistent...

    But, there's probably a better, more portable, way to calculate the
    number of processors for ps.

    Forte International, P.O. Box 1412, Ridgecrest, CA 93556-1412
    Ronald Cole <> Phone: (760) 499-9142
    President, CEO Fax: (760) 499-9152
    My PGP fingerprint: 15 6E C7 91 5F AF 17 C4 24 93 CB 6B EB 38 B5 E5

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:53    [W:0.019 / U:3.728 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site